FRP海水珊瑚混凝土与普通钢筋混凝土结构的全寿命周期成本比较
(1.中冶建筑研究总院有限公司,北京 100088;2.威海拓展纤维有限公司,山东 威海 264200)
- 文献要素
-
摘要:以海洋工程为例,从全寿命周期成本的视角出发,在一定简化条件下对FRP海水珊瑚混凝土结构和普通钢筋混凝土结构的成本进行对比,并对影响成本的因素进行分析。计算结果表明,在施工方案及工程量相同而材料运输、维护方案不同的条件下,FRP海水珊瑚混凝土结构的全寿命周期成本较普通钢筋混凝土结构具有优势,且在具有一定特性的结构中优势相当显著,因而具有良好的经济性。关键词:海洋工程;FRP海水珊瑚混凝土;全寿命周期成本Abstract:Taking the marine engineering as an example,the paper compares the cost of common reinforced structure and FRP-Coral concrete structure from the view of life cycle cost,analyzes the factors which influence the cost. The result shows that FRP-Coral concrete structure scheme have an advance over common reinforced concrete scheme on life cycle cost under the condition that the construction scheme and quantities are same,but the plan of material transportation and maintenance is different. Thus FRP-Coral concrete structure is economical and deserves to be popularized in engineering,especially in marine engineering.Keywords:marine engineering;FRP marine coral concrete;life cycle cost参考文献[1] 张淳,吴彦.沥青砼路面和水泥砼路面全寿命周期成本分析[J].公路与汽运,2010(4):235-238.[2] 韩豫,成虎.工程全寿命设计框架研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010(19):32-35.[3] Gregory A,Keoleian,Alissa Kendall. Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design[J]. Journal of Infrastructure System,2005(11):51-59.[4] 李瑞华,宋炳良.影响海运市场价格变动的因素与对策探讨[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2013(6):57-62.[5] 王草,林文斌,等.海湾桥梁桥墩维护成本优化方法浅析[J].工程经济,2014(11):54-58.[6] 王磊,赵艳林,吕海波.珊瑚骨料混凝土的基础性能及研究应用前景[J].混凝土,2012(2):99-101.建筑经济,2016(01):61-66