[摘　要]　2001年资质管理办法实施后，建筑企业的规模和建筑业的规模结构都发生了很大变化，而建筑业的绩效并没有根本好转。建筑业的绩效不高，与企业的规模和资质等级无明显关系，其根源在于产业过度竞争条件下恶性的价格竞争。借助出台新资质这种强制性市场结构矫正手段，对改善建筑业的绩效能起到一定效果。新资质标准不是简单的部分指标的增加和标准的变化及提高，而应该建立科学的资质规模结构和明晰的资质领域。

[关键词]　建筑业,绩效,价格竞争,过度竞争,资质

Abstract: Great changes have taken place in the scale of construction companies and the scale structure of the construction industry after the implementation of quality management in 2001.However, the performance of the construction industry has not fundamentally improved. The phenomenon that the performance of construction industry is inefficient has not obvious relation with the size and quality rating of the company.The reason is rooted in excessive competition under the conditions of the vicious price competition. The introduction of this new qualification structure which is a mandatory mean to correct the market structure can have an effect on performance improvement of the construction industry. The new qualification is not simply some parts of the standard indicators added, standard changed and improved， but the need to establish the scientific quality structure and clarity field of qualification.

Key words: construction industry; performance; price competition; excessive competition; qualification

[参考文献]

[1]谢识予.经济博弈论[M].上海：复旦大学出版社，1997.

[2]张雪芹.基于市场主导的建筑业产业结构调整研究[D].重庆：重庆大学，2007.

[3]卢有杰.建筑市场进入壁垒[J].建筑经济，1999（6）.

[4]曹建海.过度竞争论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社，2000:44-46.

[5]田元福,李慧民.建筑业的过度竞争及原因分析[J].建筑经济，2002（12）:10-12.

[6]史普博.规制与市场[M].上海：上海三联书店,上海人民出版社，1999:45.

[7]植草益.微观规制经济学[M].北京：中国发展出版社，1992.

[8]杨桦.建筑市场监管研究[D].上海：上海交通大学，2007.

[9]陆歆弘,金维兴.中国建筑业生产交易方式的交易费用分析[J].上海大学学报，2005（6）.

[10]邵华.建筑业新观念与建筑企业纵向一体化[J].现代管理科学，2007（11）.

建筑经济，2008（12）：5-9