[摘　要]　在对评标专家异常性评分定义的基础上，从系统偏差、非共识偏差、同行偏差和偶然偏差四个方面构建评标专家异常性评分的判定方法，并从评标现场纪律管理、工作质量考核制度、专家责任追究机制等三个方面，就加强评标专家评标行为的监督管理提出建议与措施。

[关键词]　评标专家, 异常性评分, 监督管理

Abstract: Based on the definition of abnormal score by bidding evaluation experts, constructs the judging methods for that from the perspectives of system variance, nonconsensual variance, peer variance and causal variance. And then, the paper puts forward some suggestions about how to strengthen the supervision management on the behavior of bidding evaluation expert from the perspectives of discipline management in bidding locale, the examination system of working quality and accountability mechanism to expert.

Key words: bidding evaluation expert; abnormal score; supervision and administration

[参考文献]

[1]张一化,刘殿林,孙涛.加强对评标专家自由裁量权控制管理[J].中国政府采购,2010（10）：58-60.

[2]张东伟.浅析“评审专家自由裁量权”[J].中国政府采购,2011（4）：66-67.

[3]张瑶华,朱家蓉.评标统计偏差初探[J].四川水利发电,2005, 24(3)：52-53.

[4]谢焕瑛.国家重点实验室评估专家评分偏差效应分析[J].研究与发展管理,2006（6）：134-138.

建筑经济，2013（2）：97-99