［摘　要]　关于强制招标项目范围的法律规定，历来备受业界争议。商品住宅项目不分主体、不分资金来源，一律需要招标的做法，无论实践效果还是社会反映均不理想。本文从法经济分析的角度对商品住宅项目强制招标的规定进行了成本与收益的定性分析，指出商品住宅项目强制招标是一项过剩的法律供给。

［关键词]　商品住宅项目,强制招标,法经济分析

Abstract: The law about mandatory bidding project scope is always a subject to be dispute in the industry. From the practice results and the social reflection, it is not an ideal provision that a commodity residence project must choose suppliers and construction units by bidding, regardless of the nature of its development unit and funding sources. This paper qualitative analyzes costs and benefits of the law provision for commodity residence project mandatory bidding from the perspective of economic and law, and points out that the provision of mandatory bidding for commodity residence project is an excess supply of law.

Key words: commodity residence project; mandatory bidding; law and economic analysis

［参考文献]

[1]理查德·A·波斯纳.法律的经济分析[M].北京：中国大百科全书出版社，1997：86.

[2]田开友，阮丽娟.政府采购法经济分析的基础理论构建[J].社会科学论坛，2009（8）.

[3]陶一桃.科斯与交易费用理论[J].特区经济，2000（9）.

[4]陈熙，骆仁俊.建设工程项目招投标社会成本分析[J].项目管理技术，2009（10）.

[5]黎广军.21世纪国际工程合同的发展趋势——反思中国工程合同的发展趋势[EB/OL].http：//www.chinalawedu.com/news/16900/174/2006/9/li24711942571729600216856-0.htm，2006-09-27.

建筑经济，2012（5）：39-42