摘要：咨询服务具有知识密集型特征，全过程工程咨询需要咨询人员间知识共享以实现集成化服务，且项目通常具有工期紧的特点，时间压力的影响不容忽视。为探讨咨询人员知识共享行为的驱动机理，基于MOA视角构建咨询人员知识共享行为驱动模型，并分析时间压力的调节效应。对179个全过程工程咨询项目问卷数据的回归分析发现，动机、机会与能力对知识共享行为发生具有显著的正向影响；时间压力正向调节机会与知识共享行为间的关系。研究丰富了全过程工程咨询领域对知识共享行为驱动的研究，为全过程工程咨询实践管理提供有益启示。

关键词：全过程工程咨询；知识共享；MOA框架；时间压力；调节效应

Abstract：Consulting services are characterized by knowledge intensity. Whole-process engineering consulting requires knowledge sharing among consultants to achieve integrated services. Generally the projects have feature of tight schedules，the impact of time pressure cannot be ignored. To explore the driving mechanism of consultants' knowledge-sharing behaviors，a driving model is constructed from the MOA perspective，with an analysis of the moderating effect of time pressure. Regression analysis on questionnaire survey data from 179 whole-process engineering consulting projects revealed that motivation，opportunity，and ability exert a significant positive impact on knowledge-sharing behaviors；time pressure positively moderates the relationship between opportunity and knowledge-sharing behaviors. This study enriches research on the driving factors of knowledge-sharing behaviors in the field of whole-process engineering consulting and provides valuable insights for the management of whole-process engineering consulting.

Keywords：whole-process engineering consulting；knowledge sharing；MOA framework；time pressure；moderating effect

参考文献

[1] 中国工程咨询协会.全过程工程咨询服务导则（建筑与城乡规划领域）：T/CNAEC 0602-2024[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2024.

[2] 刘露露，闻效仪，张艳华.MOA框架下制造业企业机器换人路径研究——基于1007家企业的定性比较分析[J].经济与管理，2025（2）：77-85.

[3] Siemsen E，Roth A V，Balasubramanian S. How motivation，opportunity，and ability drive knowledge sharing：The constraining-factor model[J]. Journal of operations management，2008（3）：426-445.

[4] Maruping L M，Venkatesh V，Thatcher S M B，etal. Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership[J]. Academy of management journal，2015（5）：1313-1333.

[5] Lin H F. Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability：an empirical study[J]. International journal of manpower，2007（3/4）：315-332.

[6] Turner T，Pennington W. Organizational networks and the process of corporate entrepreneurship：how the motivation，opportunity，and ability to act affect firm knowledge，learning，and innovation[J]. Small business economics，2015（2）：447-463.

[7] 薛晋洁，张佳敏，张湄婕，等.时间压力、悖论式领导对员工创造力的影响研究[J].科研管理，2023（10）：119-128.

[8] Zhang L，Cheng J. Effect of knowledge leadership on knowledge sharing in engineering project design teams：The role of social capital[J]. Project management journal，2015（5）：111-124.

[9] Liu K，Pollack J，Zhang S，etal. Linking network embeddedness and team members' informal learning effectiveness in off-site construction projects：An opportunity-motivation-ability perspective[J]. Journal of management in engineering，2022（5）.

[10] Husted K，Michailova S，Minbaeva D B，etal. Knowledge-sharing hostility and governance mechanisms：an empirical test[J]. Journal of knowledge management，2012（5）：754-773.

[11] Huang M C，Chiu Y P，Lu T C. Knowledge governance mechanisms and repatriate's knowledge sharing：the mediating roles of motivation and opportunity[J]. Journal of knowledge management，2013（5）：677-694.

[12] 疏礼兵.团队内部知识转移的过程机制与影响因素研究——以企业研发团队为例[D].杭州：浙江大学，2006.

[13] Hair J. F，Black W.C.，Babin B.J.，Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis（7thed.）[M]. Upper Saddle River，NJ：Pearson Education，2010：710-712.

建筑经济，2026（9）：41-47