摘要：全过程工程咨询作为知识密集型服务，其成果的交付需要不同专业咨询团队间的知识融合，但又不可避免地面临知识边界。基于知识边界理论，分析全过程工程咨询团队间多层级知识边界（语法、语义和语用边界）对知识融合意愿的影响，旨在促进咨询团队间知识融合。对179个全过程工程咨询项目问卷调查数据进行回归分析发现，语法边界对知识融合意愿影响不显著，语义边界和语用边界正向影响知识融合意愿。此外，语用边界在语义边界和知识融合意愿间起到部分中介作用。本研究丰富了全过程工程咨询领域关于知识边界和知识融合的理论，为实践管理提供参考。

关键词：全过程工程咨询；知识边界；知识融合意愿；问卷调查；中介效应

Abstract：As a knowledge-intensive service，whole-process engineering consulting urgently requires knowledge integration among specialty-specific consulting teams for delivering outcomes，yet it inevitably faces knowledge boundaries. Based on the knowledge boundary theory，this study analyzes the impact of multi-level knowledge boundaries（syntactic，semantic，pragmatic）on the willingness to integrate knowledge，aiming to promote knowledge integration. Regression analysis on questionnaire survey data from 179 whole-process engineering consulting projects reveals that syntactic boundaries have no significant impact on the willingness to integrate knowledge，while semantic boundaries and pragmatic boundaries positively affect it. Additionally，pragmatic boundaries play a partial mediating role between semantic boundaries and the willingness to integrate knowledge. This study enriches the theories related to knowledge boundaries and knowledge integration in the whole-process engineering consulting area，and provides useful implications for practical management.

Keywords：whole-process engineering consulting；knowledge boundaries；knowledge integration willingness；questionnaire survey；mediating effect

参考文献

[1] Carlile R P. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries：Boundary objects in new product development[J]. Organization Science，2002（4）：442-455.

[2] Carlile R P. Transferring，translating，and transforming：An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries[J]. Organization Science，2004（5）：555-568.

[3] Feng Y.，Ye，H.，& Pan，S. L. Delivering knowledge across boundaries：A case study of Bankco's offshoring projects[J]. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems，2011，3（3）：4-15.

[4] Chandan A，Divesh O，Rahul G，etal. Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability：The role of boundary spanning objects[J]. International Journal of Information Management，2022，62.

[5] Nguyen T T H. Managing knowledge integration across Boundaries Fredrick Tell，Christian Berggren，Stefano Brusoni，and Andrew Van de Ven（eds）Oxford University Press，2017，305 pp.，￡55. ISBN：9780198785972[J]. Industrial Relations Journal，2017（5-6）：518-520.

[6] Kellogg C K，Orlikowski J W，Yates J. Life in the trading zone：Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations[J]. Organization Science，2006（1）：22-44.

[7] Hsu S J，Chu T，Lin T，etal. Coping knowledge boundaries between information system and business disciplines：An intellectual capital perspective[J].Information & management，2014（2）：283-295.

[8] Hendriks，P. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing[J]. Knowledge and Process Management，1999（2）：91-100.

[9] Senge P. Sharing knowledge：the leader's role is key to a learning culture[J]. Executive excellence，1997，14：17-17.

[10] 应力，钱省三.知识管理的内涵[J].科学学研究，2001（1）：64-69.

[11] Fang，Y.，Neufeld，D.，Zhang，X. Knowledge coordination via digital artefacts in highly dispersed teams[J]. Information Systems Journal，2022，32：520-543.

[12] Carlile P R，Rebentisch E S. Into the black box：The Knowledge Transformation Cycle[J]. Management Science，2003：1180-1195. 

[13] Oborn，E.，Dawson，S. Knowledge and practice in multidisciplinary teams：Struggle，accommodation and privilege[J]. Human Relations，2010，63：1835-1857.

[14] Bechky，B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities：The transformation of understanding on a production floor[J]. Organization Science，2003（14）：312-330.

[15] Kotlarsky，J.，van den Hooff，B.，Houtman，L. Are we on the same page? Knowledge boundaries and transactive memory system development in cross-functional teams[J]. Communication Research，2015（3）：319-344.

[16] Boland，R. J.，Tenkasi，R. V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing[J]. Organization Science，1995（6）：350-372.

[17] Ho，H.，Ganesan，S. Does knowledge base compatibility help or hurt knowledge sharing between suppliers in coopetition? The role of customer participation[J]. Journal of Marketing，2013（6）：91-107.

[18] Tiwana，A.，McLean，E. R. Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development[J]. Journal of management information systems，2015（1）：13-43.

[19] Hair J. F，Black W.C.，Babin B.J.，Anderson R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis（7th ed.）[M]. Upper Saddle River，NJ：Pearson Education，2010：710-712.

[20] Kanwal，S.，Nunes，M. B.，Arif，M.，Hui，C.，Madden，A. D. Application of boundary objects in knowledge management research：A review[J]. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management，2019（2）：100-113.

[21] 李巍，钟明琳.铁路建设项目全过程工程咨询模式研究[J].铁路工程技术与经济，2025（1）：1-5.

[22] 鲍晓娜，曲刚，张国梁.交互记忆跨越知识边界对软件外包项目绩效作用研究[J].大连理工大学学报（社会科学版），2014（4）：50-56.

建筑经济，2026（4）：82-89