房地产市场信息有效性分析—来自香港的实证检验
(1.招商局集团博士后工作站, 香港,2.中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所博士后流动站, 香港,3.中国建筑设计研究院建筑节能与新能源工程中心, 北京 100044,4.中国建筑设计咨询公司, 北京 100044)
- 文献要素
-
[摘 要] 以香港房地产市场作为研究对象,在长期均衡模型和误差修正模型的基础上,通过构建一个两阶段测量模型,检验市场信息半强式有效性。实证分析结果显示,香港房地产市场的半强式信息有效性假设在0.01的显著水平被拒绝,其长期均衡价格与租金指数、房屋交易量和家庭收入水平三者线性相关,房价与长期均衡状态的偏离仅部分地被修正,市场中信息并未得到充分、及时的反映。[关键词] 房地产市场,信息有效性,长期均衡模型,误差修正模型Abstract: This study aims to examine the semi-strong form informational efficiency of Hong Kong real estate market. A two-stage regression model is set up based on long-term equilibrium model and error correction model. The empirical results show that, in the Hong Kong real estate market, the semi-strong form informational efficiency hypothesis is obviously rejected at the significant level 0.01 and the long-term equilibrium price is linearly related with the rental index, trading volume and household income. The divergence of the housing price from its long-term equilibrium state is partly adjusted which indicated that the information cannot be reflected fully and instantaneously inconsistent with the efficiency hypothesis.Key words: real estate, informational efficiency, long-term equilibrium model, error correction model[参考文献][1]Ge J X. Housing price models for Hong Kong[D]. Australia: the University of Newcastle,2004.[2]HKSAR. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Census and Statistics Department. Available from: http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_st-atistics/statistical_tables/index.jsp?subjectID=9&tableID=193 [Accessed ] 17 September 2007.[3]Shleifer A. Ineficient markets: an introduction to behavioral finance[M]. New York: Oxford University Press,2000.[4]Samuelson P A. Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly [J]. Industrial Management Review,1965,6(2):41-50.[5]Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Can the corporation survive?[J] The Financial Analysts Journal,1978(1):95.[6]Jensen M C. When Unocal Won over Pickins, shareholders and society lost [J]. Financier,1985,9(11):50-52.[7]Fama E F. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work[J]. Journal of Finance,1970(25):383-420.[8]Linneman P. An empirical test of the efficiency of the housing market [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1986(20):140-154.[9]Barkham R J, Geltner DM. Price discovery and efficiency in the UK housing market [J]. Journal of housing economics,1996(5):41-63.[10]Wang Z. Dynamics of urban residential property prices - a case study of the Manhattan market[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,2004,29(1):99-118.[11]Rosenthal S S. Residential buildings and the cost of construction: new evidence on the efficiency of the housing market [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999,81(2):288-302.[12]Fu YM, Ng L K.Market efficiency and return statistics: evidence from real estate and stock markets using a present-value approach [J]. Real Estate Economics,2001,29(2):227-250.[13]Hui E, Lui T Y. Rational expectations and market fundamentals: evidence from Hong Kong's boom and bust cycles [J]. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 2002,20(1):9-22.[14]Meese R A, Wallace N. Testing the present value relation for house prices: should I leave my house in San Francisco?[J].Journal of Urban Economics,1994,35(3):245-266.建筑经济,2010(5):46-50