建筑师负责制实施路径研究:制度逻辑、价值挖掘与实现
(浙江省肿瘤医院,浙江 杭州 310000)
- 文献要素
-
摘要:建筑师负责制作为建筑行业优化转型期间,解决设计咨询碎片化问题,减少技术界面,使工程提质增效的一剂良方,在提出与试点的八年中,伴随着全过程咨询、工程总承包等项目服务形式的出现,虽初见成效,但从项目组织、法律法规及市场化层面来看,仍有诸多方面有待突破。从建筑师负责制的制度逻辑出发,从价值挖掘与价值实现两个维度,以供给侧、需求侧为对象,以项目组织、目标为支点,从法规、行业、管理、市场等四个层面阐明当前问题,并由此分析得出基于项目组织层面、行业结构层面及建设大环境层面下的建筑师负责制实施策略,为其全面本土化落地、国际化接轨提供了理论贡献与政策启示。关键词:建筑师负责制;碎片化;市场化;价值挖掘;价值实现;实施策略Abstract:Architect responsibility system is a good solution to solve the problem of fragmentation of design consulting,reduce technical interface,and improve the quality and efficiency of projects during the optimization and transformation of the construction industry. In the eight years since it was proposed and piloted,with the emergence of project service forms such as whole-process consulting and general engineering contracting,although initial results have been achieved,from the perspective of project organization,laws and regulations,and marketization,the system of architect responsibility has been successfully implemented. Much remains to be done. This paper starts from the institutional logic of architect responsibility,from two dimensions of value mining and value realization,with supply side and demand side as the object,project organization and goal as the fulcrum,and expounds the current problems from four aspects,including regulations,industry,management and market. Based on this analysis,the implementation strategy of architect responsibility system based on project organization level,industry structure level and construction environment level is obtained,which provides theoretical contribution and policy enlightenment for its full localization and international integration.Keywords:architect responsibility system;fragmentation;marketization;value mining;value realization;implementation strategy参考文献[1] 黄也桐,庄惟敏,米凯利·博尼诺.既有建筑更新中的建筑师负责制——Eataly项目成功探因[J].建筑学报,2021(S2):75-79.[2] 朱祥明,李锐,高翼.“总设计师负责制”在园林景观工程中的探索与实践——以前海桂湾公园为例[J].南方建筑,2023(2):33-39.[3] 林洁,梁宇.建筑师负责制下的全过程工程咨询研究[J].工程技术研究,2022(17):223-225.[4] 李淼.从华为荔枝园项目看“建筑师负责制”的本土化进程[J].建筑技艺,2020(8):104-106.[5] 陶亮.建筑师负责制中的责权利关系比较研究——以行业标准合同为线索[J].南方建筑,2019(6):67-70.[6] 姜涌,庄惟敏,曹晓东,等.我国建筑师服务收费及国际比较研究[J].建筑经济,2020(6):5-12.[7] 刘恒.建筑师负责制?还是建筑师负责制!——雄安设计中心全过程实践回头看[J].建筑设计管理,2019(5):41-45.[8] 朱凯莉,魏佳,雷筱妍,等.中国国情下建筑师负责制推广策略[J].中国标准化,2019(16):35-36.[9] 赵伟樑.建筑师负责制下的收费机制探讨[J].建筑设计管理,2023(1):46-90.建筑经济,2023(12):5-11