摘要：近年来，国家鼓励在民用建筑工程中施行建筑师负责制，但在实践中建筑师负责制的推广较为困难。究其原因，建筑师负责制的相应制度条件仍不完善，无法全面保障建筑师的“权责利”，具体落地方案仍处于探索阶段。本文选取建筑师负责制发展相对完善的美国作为对比分析对象，从建筑师身份定位、建筑师执业权责利等方面对比中美建筑师负责制的差异，总结中国建筑师负责制落实中存在的问题和矛盾，基于此提出更新工程管理模式、根据国情完善相应配套政策的建议，希望为建筑师负责制在我国的落地实施提供借鉴。 关键词：建筑师负责制；制约因素；推广对策 

Abstract：In recent years，the state has encouraged the implementation of the architect responsibility system in civil construction projects，but in practice it is difficult to promote the architect responsibility system. The reason is that the corresponding institutional conditions of the architect’s responsibility system are still not perfect，and the “rights and responsibilities” of architects cannot be fully guaranteed，and the specific landing plan is still in the exploration stage. This paper selects the United States，where the development of the architect responsibility system is relatively perfect，as the comparative analysis object，compares the differences between the Chinese and American architect responsibility system from the aspects of architect’s identity positioning，architects’ practice rights and responsibilities，summarizes the problems and contradictions in the implementation of the Chinese architect responsibility system，and puts forward suggestions on updating the project management mode and improving the corresponding supporting policies according to the national conditions，hoping to provide reference for the implementation of the architect responsibility system in China. 

Keywords：architect responsibility system；constraints；promote countermeasures 

参考文献

[1] Moniz，Gon?alo Canto.“‘Training the Architect’：Modern Architectural Education Experiences.”[J]. Docomomo Journal，2013，49：10-15. 

[2] W. MacLeod. Regulation or Markets? The Case of Employment Contract[J]. CESifo Economic Studies，2005，51：2-46.

[3] 袁红，王晓京，何媛，等.美国5大建筑团体制度研究[J].建筑学报，2020（S2）：214-220. 

[4] Steghuis，Claudia，Erik Proper.“Competencies and Responsibilities of Enterprise Architects：A Jack-of-All-Trades?”[C]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg：2008.

[5] Burr K L，Jones C B. The Role of the Architect：Changes of the Past，Practices of the Present，and Indications of the Future[J]. International Journal of Construction Education and Research，2010（2）：122-138. 

[6] Allen B. Liabilities of architects and engineers to third parties[J]. Arkansas Law Review，1968，22：454. 

[7] Boakye Danquah C，Acheampong A，Adjei-Kumi T. Level of awareness of formwork design in the Ghanaian construction industry；enabling future technology application[J]. Journal of Engineering，Design and Technology，2022（4）：1015-1039. 

[8] Beard J L，Wundram E C，Loulakis M C. Design-build：Planning through development[M]. America：McGraw-Hill Education，2001.

[9] 刘依然.供给侧结构改革推动的建筑师负责制研究[D].南京：东南大学，2019. 

[10] AIA（American Institute of Architects）. 2017.“A201- 2017 general condi-tions of the contract for construction.”[S]. America：Accessed June 7，2018. https：//www.aiacontracts.org/contract-documents/25131-general-conditions-of-the-contract-for-construction。 

[11] Khalef R，El-adaway I H，Assaad R，etal. Contract risk management：A comparative study of risk allocation in exculpatory clauses and their legal treatment[J]. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction，2021（1）：04520036. 

[12] 庄惟敏.建筑师职业实践与国际建协职业实践委员会（UIA-PPC）[J].建筑创作，2010（1）：171-175. 

[13] 赵琦，姜涌，柳澎，等.建筑师职业道德刍议——中国建筑学会《注册建筑师职业道德与行为准则》编后[J].建筑学报，2022（12）：113-115. 

[14] Meijer F M，Visscher H J. The legal position of architects in the European Union[C]. Hong Kong Polytechnic University：Department of Building & Real Estate，2006. 

[15] Coble R J，Blatter R L. Concerns with safety in design/build process[J]. Journal of Architectural Engineering，1999（2）：44-48. 

[16] 吕晓华.浅谈建筑师负责制落地的两个难题与解题思路[J].建筑设计管理，2021（10）：59-68. 

建筑经济，2023（11）：5-11