- 文献要素
-
摘要:为了使EPC项目联合体成员风险分配更加合理,在识别EPC项目全过程风险的基础上,运用ISM法对总承包商风险进行层次划分,构建“四阶段”风险动态分担框架;在此基础上,针对共担风险,提出基于随机合作博弈的最优风险分担模型并进行求解,得到联合体成员的最优风险分担比例。以经济风险为例,应用此方法对其在联合体内部进行转移,实现风险的最优分配,使项目总效益提高,验证了风险动态分担模型的作用。
关键词:EPC联合体;风险动态分担;解释结构模型;博弈论
Abstract:In order to make the risk allocation of EPC project consortium members more reasonable,this paper uses the ISM method to classify the identified general contracting risks,and then builds a “four-stage” risk dynamic sharing framework. On the basis,for the sharing risks,proposes the optimum risk sharing model based on ISM-random cooperative game and gains the optimal risk sharing ratio of consortium members. Takes the economic risks as an example,applies this method to transfer them within the consortium,brings about the optimal allocation of risks,improves the total project benefits,which verifies the role of this model.
Keywords:EPC consortium;dynamic risk sharing;ISM;game theory
参考文献
[1] 闫少华,王骞,张兆宁.结合流程图与ISM的区域管制运行风险分析[J].工业安全与环保,2015(10):55-59.
[2] 仇国芳,郑艳,张涑贤.基于ISM的建筑施工高处坠落事故致因分析[J].安全与环境管理学报,2019(3):867-873.
[3] 赵辉,王雪青.大型工程项目融资风险动态分担[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016(5):59-66.
[4] 李芊,段雯.基于ISM-OWA的存量市政基础设施应用PPP模式影响因素分析与对策研究[J].现代城市研究,2019(3):123-130.
[5] 吕萍,张云,慕芬芳.总承包商和分包商供应链利益分配研究——基于改进的Shapley值法[J].运筹与管理,2012(6):211-216.
[6] TimmerJ,BormP,TijsS. On Three Shapley-like Solutions for Cooperative Games with Random Payoffs[J]. International Journal of Game Theory,2003(32):595-613.
[7] 孙晓帅,李蕊.国际工程承包联合体合作关系的分析[J].管理观察,2018(18):12-13.
建筑经济,2021(04):34-39