摘要：在“一带一路”经济思潮的影响下，国际工程项目相关纠纷解决机制的构建不仅亟待多元化的解决机制思维，也须契合国际社会“营商环境国际化与法治化”的宏观格局思潮。本文旨在结合营商环境评价视域，立足风险评估视角，对国际工程项目协同型纠纷解决机制构建的必要性进行剖析，归纳建设纠纷类型化解决机制常见路径的域内外经验，着力探索国际工程项目中FIDIC合同条件下，DAB与DRB模式相衔接的协同型纠纷解决机制，助益建设工程纠纷一次性解决，保障项目投资利益均衡。

关键词：国际工程；协同型机制；ADR模式；营商环境

Abstract：Under the influence of “One Belt And One Road” economic trend of thought，the construction of dispute settlement mechanism related to international engineering contracting is not only in urgent need of diversified solution mechanism thinking，but also in line with the international community’s macro trend of “internationalization of business environment and rule of law”. Horizon of this article is to combine business environment evaluation，based on the perspective of risk assessment for international engineering project coordination type dispute settlement mechanism is the necessity to build，inductive construction dispute settlement mechanism of common path types domain experience inside and outside，strive to explore international engineering projects under the FIDIC contract conditions DAB and DRB mode join the cooperative type of dispute settlement mechanism，benefit construction project disputes settled，security project investment benefit equilibrium.

Keywords：international engineering；collaborative mechanisms；ADR model；business environment

参考文献

[1] 林轲亮.早期中立评估制度研究[D].重庆：西南政法大学，2012.

[2] 邱闯.国际工程合同原理与实务[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社.

[3] 何伯森.国际工程合同与合同管理[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社.1999.

[4] 徐昕.论私力救济[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社，2005.

[5] 张修林.FIDIC国际工程合同DAB争议解决方式的探讨[J].建筑经济，2004（5）.

[6] 李少平.最高人民法院多元化纠纷解决机制改革意见和特邀调解规定的理解与适用》[M].北京：人民法院出版社，

2017.

工程经济，2019（6）：31-35