- 文献要素
-
摘要:以预制混凝土装配式建筑作为研究对象,将其与现浇式建筑在建设阶段的成本置于同一成本分析框架下,选取六个不同案例进行成本比较。研究结果表明:在当前的产业环境与施工条件下,装配式与现浇式在施工阶段所涉成本项中,上部结构成本项差异较大;施工成本比较中,现浇式成本较低,但装配式在装饰、电气等单位工程上均有更高的性价比。
关键词:预制装配式;现浇式;成本对比;施工阶段
Abstract:The paper takes prefabricated assembly building as the object,puts it and the cast-in-place concrete structure building under the same cost analyzing framework in construction stage,selects six cases to study. Results show that in current industrial environment and construction conditions,there’re great differences in the upper structure cost between prefabricated assembly structure and cast-in-place concrete structure,although construction cost of cast-in-place concrete structure is lower,prefabricated assembly structure has higher performance-price ratio in units of decoration,electricity,etc.
Keywords:prefabricated assembly construction;cast-in-place building;cost comparison;construction stage
参考文献
[1] 刘克光.降低装配式大板住宅建筑造价的途径[J].建筑技术,1981(11):54-56.
[2] 吕青.装配式节能建筑经济评价体系模型[J].沈阳建筑大学学报,2011(7):304-305.
[3] 闫红缨.预制装配式体系建造成本的比较分析[J].住宅产业,2012(7):37.
[4] 李颖.基于价值链模型的装配整体式建筑成本分析研究[J].中国管理信息化,2016(7):11-13.
[5] 齐宝库.装配式建筑综合效益分析方法研究[J].施工技术,2016(4):40-43.
[6] 张红霞.装配式住宅全生命周期经济性对比分析[J].新型建筑材料,2013(5):93-95.
[7] El-Haram,M. A,Marenjak,S,Horner,M. W. Development of a generic framework for collecting whole life cost data for the building industry[J].Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering,2002(2):144-151.
[8] 赵福顺.预制装配式住宅与现浇混凝土结构住宅造价对比研究[D].长春:长春工程学院,2015.
建筑经济,2018(03):71-74