您现在的位置:建筑经济>>往期回顾>2017年>第3期>>文献要素
国际PPP项目物有所值定性评价及对我国的启示
吴洪樾 袁竞峰 杜静
(东南大学建设与房地产系,江苏 南京 210096)
文献要素
摘要:物有所值(Value for Money,VFM)评价,可为PPP项目前期立项决策提供有力支持。首先分析各国VFM定性评价相关政策,对比英国、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚的VFM定性评价,然后总结我国VFM定性评价现状及问题,最后阐述各国VFM定性评价对我国的启示,为我国完善VFM定性评价提供参考。
关键词:物有所值(VFM);定性评价;PPP;建设管理
Abstract:Value for Money(VFM)evaluation,can provide powerful support for decision in PPP pre-project evaluation. Firstly,the paper analyzes the related policies of VFM qualitative evaluation in various countries,compares VFM qualitative evaluation of Britain,USA,Canada and Australia. Then,summarizes the status quo and problems of China’s qualitative evaluation of VFM. Finally,elaborates the enlightenment of foreign VFM qualitative evaluation to our country,in order to provide reference for improving the VFM qualitative evaluation for China.
Keywords:Value for Money(VFM);qualitative evaluation;PPP;construction management
参考文献
[1] HM Treasury. Value for Money assessment guidance[Z]. London,2006.
[2] Department for International Development. DFID’s approach to Value for Money(VFM)[Z].London,2011.
[3] Department for International Development. Guidance on measuring and maximising Value for Money in social transfer programmes(second edition)[Z]. London,2013.
[4] Department for Transport. Value for Money assessment:Advice note for local transport decision makers[Z].London,2013.
[5] Federal Highway Administration. Value for Money assessment for Public-Private Partnerships[Z].USA,2012.
[6] Federal Highway Administration Office of Innovative Program Delivery. P3-Screen supporting guide[Z].USA,2013.
[7] New Building Canada Fund:Procurement options analysis guide[Z]. Canada,2014.
[8] The Guide to the New Building Canada Fund P3 Screen-Suitability Assessment[Z]. Canada,2014.
[9] Infrastructure Australia. National Public Private Partnership policy framework[Z].Australia,2008.
建筑经济,2017(3):38-42
 
下载地址

    你还没注册?或者没有登录?这篇论文要求至少是本站的注册会员才能阅读!

    如果你还没注册,请赶紧点此注册吧!

    如果你已经注册但还没登录,请赶紧点此登录吧!